Ana Sayfa
Yeni Mesajlar
Forumlarda Ara
Eser (Nota) Arşivi
Yeni Mesajlar
Kayıt Arşivi
Yeni Mesajlar
Köşe Yazıları
Yeni yazılar
Yeni yorumlar
Yazı dizisi
Yazıları ara
Ansiklopedi
Yeni maddeler
Yeni yorumlar
Yeni puanlamalar
Ansiklopedi'de ara
Bizimle Paylaşın!
Giriş Yap
Kayıt Ol
Türkçe (TR)
Dil Seçici
English (US)
Türkçe (TR)
Neler Yeni
Ara
Ara
Sadece başlıkları ara
Kullanıcı:
Yeni Mesajlar
Forumlarda Ara
Menü
Giriş Yap
Kayıt Ol
Install the app
Yükle
Ana Sayfa
DîvânMakam
General Discussion
Who Is the Composer of This Peşrev ?
JavaScript devre dışı. Daha iyi bir deneyim için, önce lütfen tarayıcınızda JavaScript'i etkinleştirin.
Çok eski bir web tarayıcısı kullanıyorsunuz. Bu veya diğer siteleri görüntülemekte sorunlar yaşayabilirsiniz..
Tarayıcınızı güncellemeli veya
alternatif bir tarayıcı
kullanmalısınız.
Konuya cevap cer
Mesaj
<blockquote data-quote="nourathar" data-source="post: 85405" data-attributes="member: 2319"><p>On the contrary, thanks very much for your very interesting explanations: I am learning a lot from them and that hypothesis to explain the 'explosion of pseudographia' would explain quite a few things.</p><p>This Şamlı Selim book has quite a few pieces attributed to Gâzi Giray Han and when you see more of these pieces together it is quite obvious they are not homogeneous: some pieces do feel old and somewhat similar to the Kantemiroğlu pieces, from a time when makams and peşrevs were different, but many pieces indeed feel much more recent, with the modulations fitting much later schemes.</p><p>Also if one looks at Gâzi Giray's wikipedia page it does raise questions about when he would have had the time to compose, in between all the politics and military campaigns. The image of the warrior-composer is certainly very seductive for all kinds of reasons, perhaps similar to the Chinese warrior-poets-calligraphers: forceful and refined at the same time, unlike those Western brutes ! (a seductive image because it is also partly true). But Gâzi Giray hardly spent time in Istanbul, so it would also raise the question about how all those pieces would have been transmitted and entered into the general repertoire.</p><p>It is really interesting to think about what happened to all these pieces along the way, but overall, the sheer quantity and general reliability of oral transmission in Ottoman music does not cease to amaze.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nourathar, post: 85405, member: 2319"] On the contrary, thanks very much for your very interesting explanations: I am learning a lot from them and that hypothesis to explain the 'explosion of pseudographia' would explain quite a few things. This Şamlı Selim book has quite a few pieces attributed to Gâzi Giray Han and when you see more of these pieces together it is quite obvious they are not homogeneous: some pieces do feel old and somewhat similar to the Kantemiroğlu pieces, from a time when makams and peşrevs were different, but many pieces indeed feel much more recent, with the modulations fitting much later schemes. Also if one looks at Gâzi Giray's wikipedia page it does raise questions about when he would have had the time to compose, in between all the politics and military campaigns. The image of the warrior-composer is certainly very seductive for all kinds of reasons, perhaps similar to the Chinese warrior-poets-calligraphers: forceful and refined at the same time, unlike those Western brutes ! (a seductive image because it is also partly true). But Gâzi Giray hardly spent time in Istanbul, so it would also raise the question about how all those pieces would have been transmitted and entered into the general repertoire. It is really interesting to think about what happened to all these pieces along the way, but overall, the sheer quantity and general reliability of oral transmission in Ottoman music does not cease to amaze. [/QUOTE]
Alıntı ekle...
Kullanıcı Doğrulaması
Gönder
Ana Sayfa
DîvânMakam
General Discussion
Who Is the Composer of This Peşrev ?
Üst
Alt