Your conclusions are spot on.I can't read the Ottoman script myself but there aren't many sabâ bûselik peşrevs in the system, so fairly easy to spot the correct one: Peşrev - Gazi Giray Han (Tatar) - Saba BuselikAs you see in our system it is also saved as Gâzi Giray.My guess is either when he wrote it, he didn't name it "sabâ bûselik", at a later date someone classified it as that makam.Or the more likely case is that this piece was written much later and someone just attributed to him. There is a similar thing going on with Farabi. According to our system 40+ pieces belong to him which in reality can't be possible at all. Someone just faked names, I assume it was done in the early 20th century or late 19th.Not sure why they did it.
Your conclusions are spot on.
I can't read the Ottoman script myself but there aren't many sabâ bûselik peşrevs in the system, so fairly easy to spot the correct one: Peşrev - Gazi Giray Han (Tatar) - Saba Buselik
As you see in our system it is also saved as Gâzi Giray.
My guess is either when he wrote it, he didn't name it "sabâ bûselik", at a later date someone classified it as that makam.
Or the more likely case is that this piece was written much later and someone just attributed to him. There is a similar thing going on with Farabi. According to our system 40+ pieces belong to him which in reality can't be possible at all. Someone just faked names, I assume it was done in the early 20th century or late 19th.
Not sure why they did it.