Ana Sayfa
Yeni Mesajlar
Forumlarda Ara
Eser (Nota) Arşivi
Yeni Mesajlar
Kayıt Arşivi
Yeni Mesajlar
Köşe Yazıları
Yeni yazılar
Yeni yorumlar
Yazı dizisi
Yazıları ara
Ansiklopedi
Yeni maddeler
Yeni yorumlar
Yeni puanlamalar
Ansiklopedi'de ara
Bizimle Paylaşın!
Giriş Yap
Kayıt Ol
Türkçe (TR)
Dil Seçici
English (US)
Türkçe (TR)
Neler Yeni
Ara
Ara
Sadece başlıkları ara
Kullanıcı:
Yeni Mesajlar
Forumlarda Ara
Menü
Giriş Yap
Kayıt Ol
Install the app
Yükle
Ana Sayfa
DîvânMakam
General Discussion
The Modern Intonation System of Turkish Classical Music
JavaScript devre dışı. Daha iyi bir deneyim için, önce lütfen tarayıcınızda JavaScript'i etkinleştirin.
Çok eski bir web tarayıcısı kullanıyorsunuz. Bu veya diğer siteleri görüntülemekte sorunlar yaşayabilirsiniz..
Tarayıcınızı güncellemeli veya
alternatif bir tarayıcı
kullanmalısınız.
Konuya cevap cer
Mesaj
<blockquote data-quote="Sadikkara" data-source="post: 88057" data-attributes="member: 1605"><p>I think if the perdes' werent mathematically explained; we cannot know the answer. Only reason we know what Hicaz is what we play today, is by the tradition.</p><p></p><p>The rest is speculation, like saying it was todays' segah being 2nd degree of Hicaz as well for ottoman music before 19th century. Or that it has changed in somewhere in 19th century. I will share older records with you that in Iran it was similar to us before. So I can conclude by myself that they made reforms. My argument would be stronger. However, its only speculation. I dont believe in this.</p><p></p><p>Iran comparisions are always orientalist, yet Iran had many reforms facing towards west or old times. There is no repertoire of Iran classical music from even 19th century nor variety of Terkibs like us. Comparisions are not scientific by this way and even funny. I recommend you to stay a bit distant to western scientists regarding Turkish music, because what they say is not usually what they know or understand.</p><p></p><p>Amongst the huge repertoire of harder, new and more sensitive maqams being understandable in books and or transferred with oral tradition in Turkish music, Hicaz is very simple and easy to transfer to next generations as it is. That is why we are more likely to accept it being because of the Nays' capabilities like [USER=393]@orkun zafer özgelen[/USER] explained.</p><p></p><p>I searched deeper and found recordings from 1906-1933 from Iran, using Kürdi and Dik Kürdis in Hicaz. Which depicts a much different picture than Feldman I guess. Who says Homayun is the equavalent of Hicaz in Turkish music? I dont think such knowledge exist in any book, its maybe Bayat-e Isfahan(Homayun) or whatever, I dont know this music <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p> 1) [MEDIA=youtube]9aCDy_LTS-o[/MEDIA]</p><p>2) [MEDIA=youtube]mA_wSalqqe4[/MEDIA]</p><p>3)[MEDIA=youtube]7n8Gjx6PrdI[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sadikkara, post: 88057, member: 1605"] I think if the perdes' werent mathematically explained; we cannot know the answer. Only reason we know what Hicaz is what we play today, is by the tradition. The rest is speculation, like saying it was todays' segah being 2nd degree of Hicaz as well for ottoman music before 19th century. Or that it has changed in somewhere in 19th century. I will share older records with you that in Iran it was similar to us before. So I can conclude by myself that they made reforms. My argument would be stronger. However, its only speculation. I dont believe in this. Iran comparisions are always orientalist, yet Iran had many reforms facing towards west or old times. There is no repertoire of Iran classical music from even 19th century nor variety of Terkibs like us. Comparisions are not scientific by this way and even funny. I recommend you to stay a bit distant to western scientists regarding Turkish music, because what they say is not usually what they know or understand. Amongst the huge repertoire of harder, new and more sensitive maqams being understandable in books and or transferred with oral tradition in Turkish music, Hicaz is very simple and easy to transfer to next generations as it is. That is why we are more likely to accept it being because of the Nays' capabilities like [USER=393]@orkun zafer özgelen[/USER] explained. I searched deeper and found recordings from 1906-1933 from Iran, using Kürdi and Dik Kürdis in Hicaz. Which depicts a much different picture than Feldman I guess. Who says Homayun is the equavalent of Hicaz in Turkish music? I dont think such knowledge exist in any book, its maybe Bayat-e Isfahan(Homayun) or whatever, I dont know this music :) 1) [MEDIA=youtube]9aCDy_LTS-o[/MEDIA] 2) [MEDIA=youtube]mA_wSalqqe4[/MEDIA] 3)[MEDIA=youtube]7n8Gjx6PrdI[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Alıntı ekle...
Kullanıcı Doğrulaması
Gönder
Ana Sayfa
DîvânMakam
General Discussion
The Modern Intonation System of Turkish Classical Music
Üst
Alt